首页> 外文OA文献 >Crossing transdisciplinary boundaries within energy research:an ‘on the ground’ perspective from early career researchers
【2h】

Crossing transdisciplinary boundaries within energy research:an ‘on the ground’ perspective from early career researchers

机译:跨越能源研究的跨学科边界:早期职业研究人员的“实地”视角

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper considers some of the potential consequences of social scientists adopting physical energy terms in their publications in order to appeal to and hopefully influence policy-makers. There are a number of elements to this debate, from the more practical consideration of how energy is discussed by different parties, to more political considerations around the standing, inclusion and power of the social sciences. We also focus on the key issue of communication, the essential ingredient for translating complex information into everyday use, as well as understanding the people at the centre of energy reduction and who, in our opinion, hold the key to change. This paper highlights the importance of journals such as ERSS in providing a ‘safe space’ for social scientists to publish research specific to their discipline and to promote wider discussion in a suitable language.
机译:本文考虑了社会科学家在其出版物中采用物理能术语以吸引并希望影响决策者的一些潜在后果。这场辩论涉及许多要素,从更实际地考虑不同方如何讨论能源,到围绕社会科学的地位,包容性和力量进行更多的政治考虑。我们还将重点放在沟通的关键问题上,这是将复杂信息转化为日常使用的基本要素,以及理解节能中心的人们以及我们认为掌握变革关键的人们。本文强调了诸如ERSS之类的期刊在为社会科学家提供“安全空间”以发表针对其学科的研究并以合适的语言促进广泛讨论方面的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号